OANDA’s Leadership Reshuffle Signals Broker Risk Shifts
TL;DR: Mark Chesterman has stepped down as Chief Risk Officer at OANDA after seven years, closing a tenure that covered trading operations, M&A, board governance, and AI-related risk. His departure is part of a broader OANDA leadership overhaul that includes new co-CEOs and a promoted European head. Forex operators should read these moves as signals about where institutional risk culture at major retail brokers is heading.
Seven Years of “Almost Constant Change”
Mark Chesterman confirmed his departure from OANDA on LinkedIn on October 20, 2026. “Today was my last day at OANDA, bringing seven years to a close,” he wrote, describing the period as one of “almost constant change.” That description is accurate by any measure. During his time as CRO, OANDA navigated regulatory tightening across multiple jurisdictions, expanded its institutional offering, and absorbed the pressure of a post-COVID volatility spike that stress-tested retail broker risk desks globally.
Chesterman’s remit at OANDA went well beyond traditional risk oversight. His LinkedIn profile also lists Head of Trading as one of his roles, a position he held for two years and nine months. He cited involvement in mergers and acquisitions, trading operations, board governance, and global leadership responsibilities tied to the growth of artificial intelligence. That is an unusually broad mandate for a CRO title, which tells you something about OANDA’s internal structure during his tenure.
For operators who use forex lead generation infrastructure built on OANDA’s data feeds or white-label products, leadership continuity at the CRO level matters. A new risk posture can change spread behavior, margin policies, and counterparty terms faster than most acquisition teams account for.
A Career Built Across the London Forex Stack
Before OANDA, Chesterman spent ten months as Chief Operating Officer at Stater Global Markets, a prime-of-prime broker. Before that, he logged more than 14 years at IG Group across a ladder of increasingly senior roles: Dealer, Chief FX Dealer, Head of Futures and FX, Global Business Development Officer, and finally Chief Operating Officer of IG Institutional.
His time as Head of Futures and FX at IG lasted three years and ten months. In that role he oversaw trading strategy, client flow monetisation, and product development across FX, index derivatives, commodities, and interest rates. That is a direct overlap with the product set most retail forex brokers use to build out margin revenue. As COO of IG Institutional, he worked on client onboarding and credit risk policies, areas that now sit at the center of regulatory scrutiny from the FCA and ESMA.
His subsequent role as Global Business Development Officer at IG covered strategy, product development, marketing, and revenue growth across the institutional business and its MetaTrader 4 platform. MT4 was already in managed decline by that point, which means he was working a platform transition alongside a growth mandate, a combination that requires both commercial and operational discipline simultaneously.
OANDA’s Wider Leadership Overhaul
Chesterman’s exit is not an isolated event. OANDA has been reshaping its C-suite across 2026. In June, Lucian Lauerman was promoted to Chief Executive Officer of OANDA Europe Limited, signaling a push to consolidate European regulatory relationships under dedicated leadership. At the group level, FTMO founders Otakar Šuffner and Marek Vašíček were appointed co-CEOs following the departure of Gavin Bambury, who stepped down as CEO after discussions about the company’s direction.
Bringing in FTMO’s founders as co-CEOs is a meaningful strategic signal. FTMO built its brand entirely around funded trader programs and proprietary challenge models, a structure that sits upstream of traditional retail brokerage. OANDA’s decision to put that DNA at the top of the house suggests the broker is shifting toward the prop-firm acquisition model that has dominated retail forex volumes since 2022. That pivot will require a different risk management philosophy than the one Chesterman operated under, which may partially explain the timing of his departure.
Operators running paid acquisition campaigns that target OANDA-adjacent audiences should note that broker brand positioning is actively shifting. Audiences who responded to OANDA’s institutional credibility signals may need different creative angles as the prop-firm identity takes hold.
What This Means for Forex Operators
Broker leadership moves matter to forex operators for reasons that go beyond industry gossip. When a CRO with Chesterman’s profile exits, it often precedes changes in margin policy, counterparty risk appetite, or B-book versus A-book routing decisions. Any of those changes can affect the economics of running paid traffic to FX offers built on that broker’s infrastructure.
Second, the FTMO co-CEO appointment signals that prop-firm models are now mainstream enough to run major retail brokers. Operators who have not yet built creative and funnel architecture around funded trader acquisition are behind. The traffic patterns for prop-firm challenges are distinct from classic broker sign-up funnels: the conversion window is longer, the qualifying event is a paid challenge fee rather than a deposit, and the audience skews toward active traders aged 25 to 40 rather than first-time retail investors.
Third, OANDA’s European CEO appointment suggests continued investment in FCA and CySEC-licensed infrastructure. That is good news for operators running compliant FX campaigns in the UK and EU, where precision audience targeting is constrained by financial promotion rules. A well-capitalized European entity with dedicated leadership is more likely to support compliant co-marketing structures than a lean operation running everything from a single jurisdiction.
For any operator whose acquisition strategy touches the institutional or semi-institutional FX segment, now is a reasonable time to run a full marketing audit against current broker positioning. What worked when OANDA was signaling stability and heritage may underperform as it pivots toward funded trader energy.
The Talent Signal Brokers Send
Institutional FX has a shallow talent pool at the senior risk level. When someone with Chesterman’s background, covering 14 years at IG, a prime-of-prime COO stint, and seven years as CRO at one of the largest retail FX platforms globally, steps away from an active role, the industry pays attention. His next move will tell you where institutional risk capital thinks the opportunity is in 2027 and beyond.
The pattern across 2026 has been consistent: experienced risk and operations executives are rotating out of legacy retail broker infrastructure and into prop-firm adjacent roles, funded account platforms, or fintech layers that sit on top of traditional brokerage. That rotation reflects where margin is moving. Retail spreads have compressed to near zero on major pairs. Revenue is now generated through challenge fees, overnight financing, and institutional flow arrangements, all of which require a different risk management architecture than the one built for 2015-era retail FX.
Operators who want to stay aligned with where acquisition budgets should go in this environment should look at how their current channel mix maps against the actual trader acquisition funnel in 2026. Whether you’re running iGaming acquisition funnels or direct FX offers, the prop-firm model’s rise changes what high-intent FX audiences look like and where they spend time online. Meanwhile, verticals like crypto lead generation are seeing similar structural shifts as sophisticated traders move across asset classes, and the overlap with prop-firm FX audiences is growing measurably.
The AI-powered lead qualification tools now available to forex operators can help identify which inbound leads are prop-firm candidates versus traditional deposit-based retail traders, a segmentation that was impossible to automate at scale two years ago and is now table stakes for operators running serious volume.
Originally reported by Finance Magnates, October 2026.
Get a playbook for your vertical
Forex lead gen
FTD acquisition, depositor funnels, regulated broker campaigns across Tier 1 & Tier 2 GEOs.
Explore → iGamingiGaming marketing
Compliant funnels for licensed operators. Meta & TikTok campaigns built to survive audits and scale long-term.
Explore → LegalLaw firm marketing
Mass tort, personal injury, immigration. High-intent lead gen for US law firms with $50K+/mo budgets.
Explore →